{"id":429,"date":"2013-03-11T18:10:00","date_gmt":"2013-03-11T17:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429"},"modified":"2026-09-05T09:45:40","modified_gmt":"2026-09-05T07:45:40","slug":"fukushima-le-pcf-aurait-mieux-fait-de-sabstenir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429","title":{"rendered":"Fukushima&nbsp;: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Lundi 11 mars 2013, deux ans apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9but de la catas\u00adtrophe nucl\u00e9aire de Fukushima, le PCF a&nbsp;cru bon de dif\u00adfu\u00adser un <a class=\"spip_out\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pcf.fr\/37020\" rel=\"external\">com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9<\/a>qui m\u00eale gaillar\u00adde\u00adment hypo\u00adcri\u00adsie et r\u00e9cu\u00adp\u00e9\u00adra\u00adtion pronucl\u00e9aire.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Apr\u00e8s avoir glo\u00adri\u00adfi\u00e9 en 1945 la \u00ab&nbsp;sen\u00adsa\u00adtion\u00adnelle d\u00e9cou\u00adverte scien\u00adti\u00adfique&nbsp;\u00bb des bom\u00adbar\u00adde\u00adments cri\u00admi\u00adnels d\u2019Hiroshima et Nagasaki<span class=\"spip_note_ref\">&nbsp;[<a class=\"spip_note\" href=\"#nb1\" id=\"nh1\" rel=\"appendix\">1<\/a>]<\/span>l, le PCF sou\u00adtient depuis pr\u00e8s de 70 ans le d\u00e9ve\u00adlop\u00adpe\u00adment de l\u2019\u00e9nergie nucl\u00e9aire \u00e0&nbsp;des fins pr\u00e9\u00adten\u00addu\u00adment civiles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">De fait, le PCF fait incon\u00adtes\u00adta\u00adble\u00adment par\u00adtie des <strong>res\u00adpon\u00adsables et cou\u00adpables des dif\u00adf\u00e9\u00adrentes catas\u00adtrophes nucl\u00e9aires<\/strong>, et en par\u00adti\u00adcu\u00adlier de celles de Tchernobyl (1986, URSS) et de Fukushima (2011, Japon). En cons\u00e9\u00adquences, ce sont des excuses que le PCF devrait pr\u00e9\u00adsen\u00adter aux innom\u00adbrables vic\u00adtimes de ces catastrophes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Par ailleurs, cha\u00adcun sait que les cen\u00adtrales nucl\u00e9aires fonc\u00adtionnent avec comme com\u00adbus\u00adtible prin\u00adci\u00adpal un mine\u00adrai, l\u2019<strong>ura\u00adnium<\/strong>, dont l\u2019extraction cause n\u00e9ces\u00adsai\u00adre\u00adment de graves dom\u00admages \u00e0&nbsp;l\u2019environnement et aux popu\u00adla\u00adtions. Aussi, puisque le PCF r\u00e9it\u00e8re son sou\u00adtien \u00e0&nbsp;l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire natio\u00adnale, il doit&nbsp;dire&nbsp;:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li> <strong>s\u2019il se pro\u00adnonce pour la r\u00e9ou\u00adver\u00adture des mines d\u2019uranium fran\u00ad\u00e7aises<\/strong>, toutes fer\u00adm\u00e9es depuis long\u00adtemps, et dans ce cas de quelle fa\u00e7on il entend impo\u00adser cette r\u00e9ou\u00adver\u00adture aux popu\u00adla\u00adtions. Probablement \u00e0&nbsp;nou\u00adveau en fai\u00adsant appel aux com\u00adpa\u00adgnies de gen\u00addarmes mobiles.<\/li>\n<li> <strong>ou s\u2019il sou\u00adtient l\u2019exploitation des mines d\u2019uranium \u00e0&nbsp;l\u2019\u00e9tranger, en par\u00adti\u00adcu\u00adlier au Niger<\/strong>, o\u00f9 Areva est le bras arm\u00e9 de la France pour main\u00adte\u00adnir une poli\u00adtique n\u00e9o\u00adco\u00adlo\u00adniale. Cette der\u00adni\u00e8re per\u00admet \u00e0&nbsp;l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire de s\u2019accaparer l\u2019uranium \u00e0&nbsp;un tarif d\u00e9ri\u00adsoire, tout en conta\u00admi\u00adnant l\u2019environnement, en ass\u00e9\u00adchant la nappe phr\u00e9a\u00adtique fos\u00adsile (elle ne se recharge pas) et en cau\u00adsant le d\u00e9pla\u00adce\u00adment de popu\u00adla\u00adtions autoch\u00adtones. Enfin, rap\u00adpe\u00adlons que la France n\u2019est pas inter\u00adve\u00adnue mili\u00adtai\u00adre\u00adment au Mali \u00ab&nbsp;pour la d\u00e9mo\u00adcra\u00adtie&nbsp;\u00bb mais pour s\u00e9cu\u00adri\u00adser les mines d\u2019uranium d\u2019Areva qui se situent \u00e0&nbsp;proxi\u00admi\u00adt\u00e9 imm\u00e9diate.<\/li>\n<li> <strong>ou s\u2019il se satis\u00adfait des accords pas\u00ads\u00e9s r\u00e9cem\u00adment par MM.&nbsp;Sarkozy puis Hollande avec les pires dic\u00adta\u00adteurs d\u2019Asie cen\u00adtrale<\/strong> (Kazakhstan et Ouzb\u00e9kistan en par\u00adti\u00adcu\u00adlier) qui, lorsqu\u2019ils ne sont pas occu\u00adp\u00e9s \u00e0&nbsp;faire tor\u00adtu\u00adrer leurs oppo\u00adsants, vendent de l\u2019uranium \u00e0&nbsp;l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire fran\u00ad\u00e7aise. Ce qui confirme si n\u00e9ces\u00adsaire que, pour la France, l\u2019uranium passe bien avant la d\u00e9mo\u00adcra\u00adtie, en Asie comme en Afrique.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">En atten\u00addant que le PCF pr\u00e9\u00adcise quelle source d\u2019approvisionnement en ura\u00adnium il pr\u00e9\u00adco\u00adnise, rap\u00adpe\u00adlons qu\u2019il est impos\u00adsible d\u2019exploiter pro\u00adpre\u00adment l\u2019uranium et qu\u2019il ne sert \u00e0&nbsp;rien de se cacher der\u00adri\u00e8re de belles paroles comme les \u00ab&nbsp;exi\u00adgences accrues de trans\u00adpa\u00adrence et de d\u00e9mo\u00adcra\u00adtie, la d\u00e9fi\u00adni\u00adtion et le res\u00adpect de normes inter\u00adna\u00adtio\u00adnales&nbsp;\u00bb et <strong>autres bali\u00advernes qui ne sont jamais de mise dans le nucl\u00e9aire<\/strong>, qu\u2019il soit exploi\u00adt\u00e9 par des entre\u00adprises pri\u00adv\u00e9es (comme \u00e0&nbsp;Fukushima) ou publiques (comme \u00e0&nbsp;Tchernobyl).<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Enfin, la fa\u00e7on dont le PCF tente de pro\u00adfi\u00adter de la catas\u00adtrophe de Fukushima pour pro\u00admou\u00advoir la fic\u00adtion d\u2019un nucl\u00e9aire pr\u00e9\u00adten\u00addu\u00adment \u00ab&nbsp;s\u00e9cu\u00adri\u00ads\u00e9&nbsp;\u00bb est tout sim\u00adple\u00adment ind\u00e9\u00adcente. Et ce d\u2019autant que le PCF reprend les argu\u00adments les plus men\u00adson\u00adgers de l\u2019industrie de l\u2019atome, de la lutte contre le chan\u00adge\u00adment cli\u00adma\u00adtique - comme si l\u2019on pou\u00advait soi\u00adgner la peste avec le cho\u00adl\u00e9\u00adra - au tarif de l\u2019\u00e9lectricit\u00e9 nucl\u00e9aire, lequel est exor\u00adbi\u00adtant lorsqu\u2019on veut bien prendre en compte les d\u00e9chets radio\u00adac\u00adtifs l\u00e9gu\u00e9s \u00e0&nbsp;nos enfants et les ins\u00adtal\u00adla\u00adtions ato\u00admiques qu\u2019ils devront d\u00e9man\u00adte\u00adler \u00e0&nbsp;leurs frais et \u00e0&nbsp;leurs risques et p\u00e9rils.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lorsqu\u2019il s\u2019agit de nucl\u00e9aire, on constate que le PCF se situe h\u00e9las dans le camp des PDG d\u2019EDF et d\u2019Areva, des gou\u00adver\u00adne\u00adments, et des com\u00adpa\u00adgnies de gen\u00addarmes mobiles qui, aujourd\u2019hui comme hier, r\u00e9priment les mani\u00adfes\u00adta\u00adtions popu\u00adlaires contre l\u2019atome. C\u2019est affligeant.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lundi 11 mars 2013 (Fukushima + 2&nbsp;ans)<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">St\u00e9phane Lhomme<br class=\"autobr\"> Directeur de l\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire<br class=\"autobr\">\n<a class=\"spip_url spip_out auto\" href=\"http:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\" rel=\"nofollow external\">http:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org<\/a><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span class=\"spip_note_ref\">[<a class=\"spip_note\" href=\"#nh1\" rev=\"appendix\" title=\"Notes 1\">1<\/a>]&nbsp;<\/span><a class=\"spip_url spip_out auto\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dissident-media.org\/infonucleaire\/l_humanite_8aout.htm\" rel=\"nofollow external\">http:\/\/www.dissident-media.org\/infonucleaire\/l_humanite_8aout.htm<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lundi 11 mars 2013, deux ans apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9but de la catas\u00adtrophe nucl\u00e9aire de Fukushima, le PCF a&nbsp;cru bon de dif\u00adfu\u00adser un com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9qui m\u00eale gaillar\u00adde\u00adment hypo\u00adcri\u00adsie et r\u00e9cu\u00adp\u00e9\u00adra\u00adtion pro\u00adnu\u00adcl\u00e9aire. Apr\u00e8s avoir glo\u00adri\u00adfi\u00e9 en 1945 la \u00ab&nbsp;sen\u00adsa\u00adtion\u00adnelle d\u00e9cou\u00adverte scien\u00adti\u00adfique&nbsp;\u00bb des bom\u00adbar\u00adde\u00adments cri\u00admi\u00adnels d\u2019Hiroshima et Nagasaki&nbsp;[1]l, le PCF sou\u00adtient depuis pr\u00e8s de 70 ans le d\u00e9ve\u00adlop\u00adpe\u00adment&nbsp;de&nbsp;[\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Fukushima\u00a0: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fukushima\u00a0: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Lundi 11 mars 2013, deux ans apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9but de la catas\u00adtrophe nucl\u00e9aire de Fukushima, le PCF a&nbsp;cru bon de dif\u00adfu\u00adser un com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9qui m\u00eale gaillar\u00adde\u00adment hypo\u00adcri\u00adsie et r\u00e9cu\u00adp\u00e9\u00adra\u00adtion pronucl\u00e9aire. Apr\u00e8s avoir glo\u00adri\u00adfi\u00e9 en 1945 la \u00ab&nbsp;sen\u00adsa\u00adtion\u00adnelle d\u00e9cou\u00adverte scien\u00adti\u00adfique&nbsp;\u00bb des bom\u00adbar\u00adde\u00adments cri\u00admi\u00adnels d\u2019Hiroshima et Nagasaki&nbsp;[1]l, le PCF sou\u00adtient depuis pr\u00e8s de 70 ans le d\u00e9ve\u00adlop\u00adpe\u00adment de [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-03-11T17:10:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-05T07:45:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"Fukushima&nbsp;: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-03-11T17:10:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-05T07:45:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429\"},\"wordCount\":686,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Communiqu\u00e9s\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429\",\"name\":\"Fukushima\u00a0: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-03-11T17:10:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-05T07:45:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=429#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fukushima&nbsp;: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\",\"description\":\"Organisme ind\u00e9pendant de surveillance de l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/logo-ODN.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/logo-ODN.png\",\"width\":160,\"height\":160,\"caption\":\"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fukushima\u00a0: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fukushima\u00a0: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","og_description":"Lundi 11 mars 2013, deux ans apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9but de la catas\u00adtrophe nucl\u00e9aire de Fukushima, le PCF a&nbsp;cru bon de dif\u00adfu\u00adser un com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9qui m\u00eale gaillar\u00adde\u00adment hypo\u00adcri\u00adsie et r\u00e9cu\u00adp\u00e9\u00adra\u00adtion pronucl\u00e9aire. Apr\u00e8s avoir glo\u00adri\u00adfi\u00e9 en 1945 la \u00ab&nbsp;sen\u00adsa\u00adtion\u00adnelle d\u00e9cou\u00adverte scien\u00adti\u00adfique&nbsp;\u00bb des bom\u00adbar\u00adde\u00adments cri\u00admi\u00adnels d\u2019Hiroshima et Nagasaki&nbsp;[1]l, le PCF sou\u00adtient depuis pr\u00e8s de 70 ans le d\u00e9ve\u00adlop\u00adpe\u00adment de [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429","og_site_name":"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","article_published_time":"2013-03-11T17:10:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-05T07:45:40+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"Fukushima&nbsp;: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir","datePublished":"2013-03-11T17:10:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-05T07:45:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429"},"wordCount":686,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Communiqu\u00e9s"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429","url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429","name":"Fukushima\u00a0: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-03-11T17:10:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-05T07:45:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=429#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fukushima&nbsp;: le PCF aurait mieux fait de s\u2019abstenir"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/","name":"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","description":"Organisme ind\u00e9pendant de surveillance de l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#organization","name":"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/logo-ODN.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/logo-ODN.png","width":160,"height":160,"caption":"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=429"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1780,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429\/revisions\/1780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}