{"id":456,"date":"2013-01-10T20:08:00","date_gmt":"2013-01-10T19:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456"},"modified":"2026-09-05T09:45:44","modified_gmt":"2026-09-05T07:45:44","slug":"lobservatoire-du-nucleaire-accuse-le-cnrs-de-tromperie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456","title":{"rendered":"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><i><a class=\"spip_in\" type=\"application\/pdf\">Lire le docu\u00adment com\u00adplet -&nbsp;PDF<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le 7&nbsp;jan\u00advier 2013, le CNRS a&nbsp;annon\u00adc\u00e9 (<a class=\"spip_url spip_out\" href=\"http:\/\/www2.cnrs.fr\/presse\/communique\/2933.htm\" rel=\"external\">http:\/\/www2.cnrs.fr\/presse\/communiq\u2026<\/a>) par com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9 la publi\u00adca\u00adtion d\u2019un docu\u00adment mul\u00adti\u00adm\u00e9\u00addia sur le nucl\u00e9aire, pr\u00e9\u00adten\u00addant que \u00ab&nbsp;Cette ani\u00adma\u00adtion donne au grand public des cl\u00e9s pour mieux com\u00adprendre la pro\u00adbl\u00e9\u00adma\u00adtique du nucl\u00e9aire et ain\u00adsi par\u00adti\u00adci\u00adper au d\u00e9bat qui se d\u00e9rou\u00adle\u00adra de jan\u00advier \u00e0&nbsp;avril 2013.&nbsp;\u00bb<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le CNRS pou\u00advait \u00e9ven\u00adtuel\u00adle\u00adment prendre posi\u00adtion en faveur de l\u2019atome, mais \u00e0&nbsp;condi\u00adtion de le faire de fa\u00e7on affi\u00adch\u00e9e et assu\u00adm\u00e9e. Au contraire, jouant de toute \u00e9vi\u00addence de son sta\u00adtut d\u2019organisme public, le CNRS laisse habi\u00adle\u00adment pen\u00adser que le conte\u00adnu de son docu\u00adment est non par\u00adti\u00adsan et ne fait que pr\u00e9\u00adsen\u00adter de fa\u00e7on neutre et hon\u00adn\u00eate les \u00e9l\u00e9\u00adments du d\u00e9bat sur le nucl\u00e9aire. Il s\u2019agit d\u2019une trom\u00adpe\u00adrie d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le docu\u00adment du CNRS navigue entre r\u00e9\u00e9cri\u00adture de l\u2019Histoire et pro\u00adpa\u00adgande insi\u00addieuse. D\u2019ailleurs, d\u00e8s l\u2019introduction, le ton est don\u00adn\u00e9 avec la mise en exergue d\u2019un slo\u00adgan&nbsp;: \u00ab&nbsp;La fis\u00adsion de 1&nbsp;gramme d\u2019uranium 235 pro\u00adduit autant d\u2019\u00e9nergie ther\u00admique que la com\u00adbus\u00adtion de 1,6 tonne de fuel ou de 2,8 tonnes de char\u00adbon&nbsp;\u00bb, \u00e9va\u00adcuant comme par magie l\u2019impact - des mines d\u2019uranium jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la pro\u00adduc\u00adtion de d\u00e9chets radio\u00adac\u00adtifs - de l\u2019utilisation de ce gramme d\u2019uranium.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L\u2019utilisation de ce slo\u00adgan ne rel\u00e8ve aucu\u00adne\u00adment d\u2019une infor\u00adma\u00adtion p\u00e9da\u00adgo\u00adgique en direc\u00adtion du grand public, mais tout sim\u00adple\u00adment de la pro\u00adpa\u00adgande. A&nbsp;titre indi\u00adca\u00adtif, si le docu\u00adment du CNRS avait \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9di\u00adg\u00e9 hon\u00adn\u00ea\u00adte\u00adment, il se serait ouvert sur une phrase du genre&nbsp;:\u00ab&nbsp;L\u2019\u00e9nergie nucl\u00e9aire&nbsp;: des avan\u00adtages et des incon\u00adv\u00e9\u00adnients, et un grand d\u00e9bat de soci\u00e9\u00adt\u00e9&nbsp;\u00bb. A&nbsp;condi\u00adtion tou\u00adte\u00adfois que l\u2019ensemble soit impartial.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire publie une cri\u00adtique point par point du docu\u00adment du CNRS, d\u00e9mas\u00adquant de nom\u00adbreuses trom\u00adpe\u00adries, sou\u00advent habiles comme les men\u00adsonges par omis\u00adsions. Par exemple&nbsp;:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Le CNRS jus\u00adti\u00adfie l\u2019option nucl\u00e9aire par \u00ab&nbsp;la diver\u00adsi\u00adt\u00e9 g\u00e9o\u00adgra\u00adphique et poli\u00adtique des pays pro\u00adduc\u00adteurs d\u2019uranium&nbsp;\u00bb, oubliant d\u00e9li\u00adb\u00e9\u00adr\u00e9\u00adment que, depuis 40 ans, la France uti\u00adlise prio\u00adri\u00adtai\u00adre\u00adment l\u2019uranium du Niger qu\u2019elle s\u2019accapare \u00e0&nbsp;un tarif d\u00e9ri\u00adsoire&nbsp;: aujourd\u2019hui encore, le Pr\u00e9sident du Niger n\u2019est autre qu\u2019un ancien direc\u00adteur\u2026 d\u2019une filiale d\u2019Areva&nbsp;!<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Le sur\u00adg\u00e9\u00adn\u00e9\u00adra\u00adteur Superph\u00e9nix n\u2019est \u00e9vo\u00adqu\u00e9 que pour signa\u00adler qu\u2019il est en d\u00e9man\u00adt\u00e8\u00adle\u00adment, le CNRS cen\u00adsu\u00adrant l\u2019\u00e9chec catas\u00adtro\u00adphique de ce pro\u00adto\u00adtype qui n\u2019aura r\u00e9us\u00adsi qu\u2019un seul \u00ab&nbsp;exploit&nbsp;\u00bb&nbsp;: d\u00e9s\u00adin\u00adt\u00e9\u00adgrer 10 mil\u00adliards d\u2019euros.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Le r\u00e9ac\u00adteur EPR de Flamanville (Manche) est \u00e9vo\u00adqu\u00e9 mais\u2026 en oubliant tota\u00adle\u00adment de signa\u00adler le retard de 5&nbsp;ans du chan\u00adtier, les nom\u00adbreuses mal\u00adfa\u00ad\u00e7ons d\u00e9tec\u00adt\u00e9es, et en mini\u00admi\u00adsant l\u2019ampleur du sur\u00adco\u00fbt. Au contraire, l\u2019EPR est valo\u00adri\u00ads\u00e9 - \u00ab&nbsp;son int\u00e9\u00adr\u00eat r\u00e9side dans sa tr\u00e8s grande s\u00fbre\u00adt\u00e9&nbsp;\u00bb- alors que les p\u00e9ri\u00adp\u00e9\u00adties du chan\u00adtier et la concep\u00adtion (datant du d\u00e9but des ann\u00e9es 90) laissent au contraire craindre le&nbsp;pire.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>la fusion nucl\u00e9aire est pr\u00e9\u00adsen\u00adt\u00e9e comme \u00ab&nbsp;un r\u00eave qui jus\u00adti\u00adfie les moyens colos\u00adsaux mis en \u0153uvre par ses pro\u00admo\u00adteurs&nbsp;\u00bb, le CNRS valo\u00adrise le pro\u00adjet ITER en oubliant de pr\u00e9\u00adci\u00adser qu\u2019il a&nbsp;\u00e9t\u00e9 condam\u00adn\u00e9 par trois Prix Nobel de Physique, dont les fran\u00ad\u00e7ais Pierre-Gilles de Gennes et Georges Charpak (cf <a class=\"spip_url spip_out\" href=\"http:\/\/reacteur.iter.free.fr\" rel=\"external\">http:\/\/reacteur.iter.free.fr<\/a>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Par ailleurs, les catas\u00adtrophes nucl\u00e9aires sont pr\u00e9\u00adsen\u00adt\u00e9es comme d\u2019excellentes oppor\u00adtu\u00adni\u00adt\u00e9s pour \u00ab&nbsp;tirer des ensei\u00adgne\u00adments&nbsp;\u00bb et \u00ab&nbsp;am\u00e9\u00adlio\u00adrer encore le s\u00fbre\u00adt\u00e9 des r\u00e9ac\u00adteurs&nbsp;\u00bb, et le nombre de morts cau\u00ads\u00e9s par Tchernobyl est celui de l\u2019AIEA, \u00ab&nbsp;moins de 50&nbsp;\u00bb, le CNRS fai\u00adsait fi des esti\u00adma\u00adtions alter\u00adna\u00adtives (jusqu\u2019\u00e0 200 000&nbsp;d\u00e9c\u00e8s).<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire demande au CNRS d\u2019afficher clai\u00adre\u00adment son enga\u00adge\u00adment par\u00adti\u00adsan en faveur de l\u2019atome ou, mieux, de rem\u00adpla\u00adcer son docu\u00adment par un autre qui soit, cette fois-ci, r\u00e9el\u00adle\u00adment hon\u00adn\u00eate et non-partisan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lire le docu\u00adment com\u00adplet -&nbsp;PDF Le 7&nbsp;jan\u00advier 2013, le CNRS a&nbsp;annon\u00adc\u00e9 (http:\/\/www2.cnrs.fr\/presse\/communiq\u2026) par com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9 la publi\u00adca\u00adtion d\u2019un docu\u00adment mul\u00adti\u00adm\u00e9\u00addia sur le nucl\u00e9aire, pr\u00e9\u00adten\u00addant que \u00ab&nbsp;Cette ani\u00adma\u00adtion donne au grand public des cl\u00e9s pour mieux com\u00adprendre la pro\u00adbl\u00e9\u00adma\u00adtique du nucl\u00e9aire et ain\u00adsi par\u00adti\u00adci\u00adper au d\u00e9bat qui se d\u00e9rou\u00adle\u00adra de jan\u00advier \u00e0&nbsp;avril 2013.&nbsp;\u00bb Le CNRS pou\u00advait \u00e9ventuellement&nbsp;[\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Lire le docu\u00adment com\u00adplet -&nbsp;PDF Le 7&nbsp;jan\u00advier 2013, le CNRS a&nbsp;annon\u00adc\u00e9 (http:\/\/www2.cnrs.fr\/presse\/communiq\u2026) par com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9 la publi\u00adca\u00adtion d\u2019un docu\u00adment mul\u00adti\u00adm\u00e9\u00addia sur le nucl\u00e9aire, pr\u00e9\u00adten\u00addant que \u00ab&nbsp;Cette ani\u00adma\u00adtion donne au grand public des cl\u00e9s pour mieux com\u00adprendre la pro\u00adbl\u00e9\u00adma\u00adtique du nucl\u00e9aire et ain\u00adsi par\u00adti\u00adci\u00adper au d\u00e9bat qui se d\u00e9rou\u00adle\u00adra de jan\u00advier \u00e0&nbsp;avril 2013.&nbsp;\u00bb Le CNRS pou\u00advait \u00e9ven\u00adtuel\u00adle\u00adment [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-01-10T19:08:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-05T07:45:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-01-10T19:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-05T07:45:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456\"},\"wordCount\":685,\"articleSection\":[\"Communiqu\u00e9s\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456\",\"name\":\"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-01-10T19:08:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-05T07:45:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?p=456#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire\",\"description\":\"Organisme ind\u00e9pendant de surveillance de l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","og_description":"Lire le docu\u00adment com\u00adplet -&nbsp;PDF Le 7&nbsp;jan\u00advier 2013, le CNRS a&nbsp;annon\u00adc\u00e9 (http:\/\/www2.cnrs.fr\/presse\/communiq\u2026) par com\u00admu\u00adni\u00adqu\u00e9 la publi\u00adca\u00adtion d\u2019un docu\u00adment mul\u00adti\u00adm\u00e9\u00addia sur le nucl\u00e9aire, pr\u00e9\u00adten\u00addant que \u00ab&nbsp;Cette ani\u00adma\u00adtion donne au grand public des cl\u00e9s pour mieux com\u00adprendre la pro\u00adbl\u00e9\u00adma\u00adtique du nucl\u00e9aire et ain\u00adsi par\u00adti\u00adci\u00adper au d\u00e9bat qui se d\u00e9rou\u00adle\u00adra de jan\u00advier \u00e0&nbsp;avril 2013.&nbsp;\u00bb Le CNRS pou\u00advait \u00e9ven\u00adtuel\u00adle\u00adment [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456","og_site_name":"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","article_published_time":"2013-01-10T19:08:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-05T07:45:44+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie","datePublished":"2013-01-10T19:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-05T07:45:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456"},"wordCount":685,"articleSection":["Communiqu\u00e9s"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456","url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456","name":"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie - Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-01-10T19:08:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-05T07:45:44+00:00","author":{"@id":""},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?p=456#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"L\u2019Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire accuse le CNRS de tromperie"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/","name":"Observatoire du nucl\u00e9aire","description":"Organisme ind\u00e9pendant de surveillance de l\u2019industrie nucl\u00e9aire","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=456"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/456\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1807,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/456\/revisions\/1807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.observatoire-du-nucleaire.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}